Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blue Prism Exam AD01 Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blue Prism's AD01 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 2
[All AD01 Questions]

A Developer has a number of cases which need to be loaded into a Work Queue. The source data collection contains a field to indicate the customer account type as either Business, Personal or Joint Which method should the Developer use to ensure that the Business Customer cases are worked first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rozella
1 months ago
Option D is like trying to avoid the gym by only eating salad. You're still missing half the equation.
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
7 days ago
A: I think option A is the best choice. Setting the priority of Business cases to '0' will ensure they are worked first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
1 months ago
Option C is just wrong. Setting priority to 'T'? What is this, a time machine? Let's stick to the 21st century, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Seems like option A might be a bit more robust, even if it's a bit more work. Priorities are pretty standard, and you know exactly where the business cases will land.
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
22 days ago
I agree, using priorities is a common method to manage workload. Option A seems like a reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
1 months ago
Yeah, setting the priority to '0' for Business cases seems like a clear way to ensure they are worked on first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
1 months ago
I think option A is a good choice. Prioritizing Business cases with '0' makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
I'm with Malika on this one. Tagging the business cases is way simpler than messing around with priority numbers. Why make it harder than it needs to be?
upvoted 0 times
Zachary
3 hours ago
Agreed, no need to complicate things with priority numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
9 days ago
I think setting the Tag to '^Business' is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
28 days ago
Yeah, setting the priority of each Business case to '0' makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
1 months ago
I agree, tagging the business cases is definitely simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
But setting the priority of Business cases to '0' ensures they are worked first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
2 months ago
Option B looks like the easiest and most straightforward way to ensure business cases are worked first. Who wants to bother with priority settings when you can just tag the cases?
upvoted 0 times
Selma
27 days ago
Yeah, setting the tag for Business cases makes it simple and easy to manage the queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient way to prioritize the Business cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77