Blockchain Exam CBSP Topic 6 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSP exam

Question #: 76
Topic #: 6

[All CBSP Questions]

Which smart contract auditing strategy identities which variables in the function can be affected by the person running it?

AManual Code Analysis

BSymbolic Execution

CTaint Analysis

DControl Flow Analysis

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Tammara at Oct 06, 2023, 11:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dottie

1 months ago

Taint Analysis? I thought we were talking about smart contracts, not high school drama.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lottie

1 months ago

Taint Analysis is the smart contract auditor's version of 'who touched it last?' I'm going with that one.

upvoted 0 times

Felicitas

7 days ago

Control Flow Analysis might also be important to consider in auditing smart contracts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

12 days ago

I think Symbolic Execution could also be useful in identifying affected variables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

24 days ago

I agree, Taint Analysis is a great way to track who interacted with the variables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

2 months ago

Manual Code Analysis is too manual, and Symbolic Execution is overkill for this use case. Taint Analysis is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

2 months ago

Control Flow Analysis is a good option too, but I think Taint Analysis is more specific to identifying affected variables.

upvoted 0 times

Rupert

8 days ago

Manual Code Analysis can be time-consuming, but it's still a valuable strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

24 days ago

I think Symbolic Execution is also a good strategy for smart contract auditing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

1 months ago

I agree, Taint Analysis is more specific in identifying affected variables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

2 months ago

I see your point, but I still think C) Taint Analysis is the best choice for this question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarence

2 months ago

I believe it could also be B) Symbolic Execution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

2 months ago

Taint Analysis seems like the right choice here. It can identify which variables can be influenced by the person running the contract.

upvoted 0 times

Laurena

18 days ago

Manual Code Analysis is important too, but Taint Analysis seems more specific for this task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

23 days ago

Control Flow Analysis might help in determining the flow of the contract's execution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 months ago

Symbolic Execution could also be useful in understanding the behavior of the smart contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

1 months ago

Symbolic Execution could also be useful in understanding how the contract behaves.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

2 months ago

I agree, Taint Analysis is the way to go for identifying affected variables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eileen

2 months ago

I agree, Taint Analysis is the way to go for identifying affected variables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

2 months ago

I think the answer is C) Taint Analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...