Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain Exam CBSP Topic 2 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSP exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 2
[All CBSP Questions]

This sample code is vulnerable to which of the following attacks? Select all that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Salena at Aug 09, 2023, 08:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rosalyn
1 months ago
Looks like the dev team was playing a game of 'how many security holes can we fit in one contract?' A, D, and maybe even B - this is a security nightmare waiting to happen!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
1 months ago
Ooh, Reentrancy and Race Conditions, the dynamic duo of Solidity vulnerabilities! This question is a real brain-teaser, but I'm feeling confident about A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
Arithmetic? Really? I mean, the code doesn't look like it's doing any complex calculations, so I doubt that's the issue. Guess the developers need to brush up on their security knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Hoa
12 days ago
D) Race Conditions
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
1 months ago
B) Unchecked Return Values
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
1 months ago
A) Reentrancy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Florinda
2 months ago
Unchecked Return Values? That's a good catch, but I think Race Conditions is also a valid option here. Gotta watch out for those tricky race conditions!
upvoted 0 times
Renato
2 months ago
Yes, it's important to be aware of all possible attacks, including Unchecked Return Values and Race Conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
2 months ago
I agree, Race Conditions can definitely be a vulnerability in this code.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julie
2 months ago
I believe Unchecked Return Values can also be a vulnerability in this code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a classic case of Reentrancy. That's a major vulnerability in Solidity contracts, so I'd say A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Janine
20 days ago
Margart: It's always good to be cautious with these vulnerabilities, they can cause serious issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
1 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure about that, but I think B) Unchecked Return Values could also pose a threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
1 months ago
User 2: I think D) Race Conditions could also be a potential attack in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, A) Reentrancy is definitely a vulnerability in this code.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
2 months ago
I agree with Leonora, those two attacks can exploit the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
2 months ago
I think the code is vulnerable to Reentrancy and Race Conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77