Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blockchain Exam CBSA Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSA exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All CBSA Questions]

You have flown to NYC to have a discussion with a technical executive of a too big to fail bank. You are having a discussion about blockchain algos and the customer is asking what are some disadvantages of using a POW algo?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gary
1 months ago
The 51% attack mitigation is an advantage, not a disadvantage! But I agree that the huge energy costs of POW are a major downside. Gotta love those high electricity bills.
upvoted 0 times
France
3 days ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 days ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
15 days ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
1 months ago
I'm going to go with C. Spending a ton of money on computational power doesn't sound like a very efficient or sustainable model for a blockchain network. Maybe they should look into Proof-of-Stake instead?
upvoted 0 times
Clare
18 days ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kate
1 months ago
Haha, can you imagine how much it must cost to run a POW blockchain? The electric bill alone would be enough to bankrupt a small country!
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
13 days ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
16 days ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
18 days ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
2 months ago
Hmm, I think B and C are both good options. The fact that the only use case for the computational power is the blockchain itself is a major disadvantage of the POW algorithm.
upvoted 0 times
Karan
5 hours ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
5 days ago
B) Only use case for computational power is blockchain
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
13 days ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
22 days ago
I agree, C is definitely a major disadvantage. The amount of computational power required can be a barrier for many miners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
28 days ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
1 months ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
2 months ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
The correct answer is C. Large expenditures for computational power. Proof-of-Work (POW) algorithms require a significant amount of computational power, which can be quite costly for miners and the overall network.
upvoted 0 times
Cora
24 days ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 months ago
B) Only use case for computational power is blockchain
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 months ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casandra
2 months ago
E) 51% attack mitigation is an important factor to consider when discussing disadvantages of using a POW algo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
2 months ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power can be a drawback for using a POW algo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
3 months ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control is a major disadvantage of using a POW algo.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77