Blockchain Exam CBDE Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam

Question #: 86
Topic #: 2

[All CBDE Questions]

When considering smart contracts and the blockchain it's good:

Ato move all existing logic to the blockchain, so everything runs on the same system. This way it might be more complex, but easier to maintain.

Bto move only those parts to the blockchain that really need the blockchain. This way smart contracts can be easier to read, easier to test and are not so complex.

Cto move those parts to the blockchain that deal with Ether transfers. All other parts can remain in traditional database systems. This way only the value-transfer is on the blockchain.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Minna at Apr 25, 2024, 09:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Audry

1 months ago

B all the way. I don't want to be the one trying to debug a blockchain-powered grocery list, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Earleen

3 days ago

Daron: Definitely, debugging a blockchain-powered grocery list does not sound like fun.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

8 days ago

User 2: Yeah, it's important to avoid unnecessary complexity when it comes to smart contracts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

11 days ago

User 1: I agree, keeping it simple with just the necessary parts on the blockchain makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernice

1 months ago

Alright, who's the comedian that suggested option A? That's just asking for trouble, like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.

upvoted 0 times

Dan

16 days ago

Loise: Definitely, we don't want to overcomplicate things by moving everything to the blockchain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loise

1 months ago

User 2: I agree, keeping it simple and only using the blockchain when necessary makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

1 months ago

User 1: Option B seems like the most practical approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

2 months ago

Whoa, option A? Are we trying to create a blockchain monster here? No thank you, I'll take B and keep things simple.

upvoted 0 times

Marti

1 months ago

Herminia: Exactly, no need to complicate things by moving everything onto the blockchain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

1 months ago

User 2: Yeah, keeping it simple with just the necessary parts on the blockchain makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

1 months ago

User 1: I agree, option B seems more practical and less overwhelming.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

2 months ago

C seems like the sweet spot to me. Keep the Ether transfers on the blockchain, but let the rest live in a traditional system. Best of both worlds!

upvoted 0 times

Francisca

4 days ago

True, having a balance between security and simplicity is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

9 days ago

It could be, but it might also make the smart contracts more complex and harder to maintain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenita

1 months ago

But wouldn't it be more secure to have everything on the same system?

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederica

2 months ago

I agree, keeping only the Ether transfers on the blockchain makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

2 months ago

Definitely B. Why complicate things when you can just put the critical stuff on the blockchain and keep the rest in a regular database? Efficiency, people!

upvoted 0 times