Haha, option D is like building a car with duct tape and chewing gum. The TAS should definitely have components that can be easily replaced, but 'without affecting the overall behavior'? That's asking a bit much!
Absolutely, option B is the way to go. The TAS needs to be under configuration management along with the entire test infrastructure. Maintaining traceability is crucial.
Option A is a bit off. The TAS should be runnable in the development environment, but it doesn't have to be there because of that. Programming knowledge is important, but not a strict requirement for maintainability.
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) The TAS must consist of components that can be easily replaced without affecting the overall behavior of the TAS itself.
I think the answer is A) The TAS must run in the development environment because development and programming knowledge are required for its maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Craig
1 months agoMaryrose
9 days agoSherita
13 days agoVerda
1 months agoSharen
2 days agoLaurel
11 days agoJoni
1 months agoGilma
1 months agoCharolette
2 days agoAja
16 days agoGlennis
22 days agoOna
2 months agoSue
8 days agoRolande
11 days agoFernanda
12 days agoJanessa
14 days agoPhung
2 months agoVi
3 months agoPhung
3 months ago