Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam PDP9 Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's PDP9 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All PDP9 Questions]

Which of the following is NOT a processor obligation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The definitions of ''public authority'' and ''public body'' for the purposes of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 are found in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 2018 respectively. Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 2018 provides that a public authority or a public body is one that is listed in Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or is designated by an order under section 5 of that Act. However, a court or tribunal acting in its judicial capacity is not considered a public authority or a public body under the Data Protection Act 2018.Reference:

Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 20181

Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000


Contribute your Thoughts:

Annett
1 months ago
Wait, so the processor has to be a mind reader and know what the controller is thinking? This exam is getting a bit too 'out there' for my liking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
1 months ago
I'm going with D. The processor is definitely obligated to inform the controller about any intended changes to other processors.
upvoted 0 times
Refugia
4 days ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
5 days ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
9 days ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammara
2 months ago
Haha, this exam is like a game of 'Spot the Odd One Out'. C is definitely the most random option here.
upvoted 0 times
Rolf
15 days ago
D) To inform the controller of any intended changes of other processors so they can object
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
23 days ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
1 months ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. The processor doesn't need to consult the controller before appointing other processors, as long as they inform the controller about any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it might be B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 months ago
Option C seems a bit out of place here. Why would a processor need to provide the controller with corporate information about its board members?
upvoted 0 times
Leota
1 months ago
D) To inform the controller of any intended changes of other processors so they can object
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 months ago
B) To consult the controller prior to appointing any processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
2 months ago
A) To follow the instructions of the controller in processing personal data
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meaghan
2 months ago
I agree with Tasia. The processor's obligation is not to provide corporate information about its board members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) To provide the controller with corporate information relating to its board members.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77