Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam MBP18 Topic 7 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's MBP18 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 7
[All MBP18 Questions]

A record company is implementing a new system to replace an existing legacy system. The project has challenging as the new system must be implemented before support for the existing system is withdrawn. The business users have been involved throughout the project and their confidence in the new system is high.

Which implementation approach is the LEAST appropriate in this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Karrie
1 months ago
I'd go with the direct changeover, just to see the look on the business users' faces. Gotta keep them on their toes, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
1 months ago
Pilot? Seriously? With the tight timeline, they don't have time to test the new system on a small scale. They need to go all-in, but carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
2 days ago
User 3: What about Parallel running? Wouldn't that be a safer option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
3 days ago
User 2: I agree, it's too risky to switch directly without any testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
18 days ago
User 1: I think Direct changeover would be the least appropriate approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
1 months ago
Parallel running? Are you kidding me? That's overkill, and a huge waste of resources. This isn't a mission-critical system, people!
upvoted 0 times
Nina
24 days ago
C: Pilot approach could also work well in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
28 days ago
B: Yeah, I think phased implementation would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
1 months ago
A: I agree, parallel running seems like too much for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulina
2 months ago
Phased approach would be the safest option here. Gradually transitioning to the new system while maintaining the old one is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Marnie
17 days ago
D) Parallel running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
19 days ago
C) Direct changeover
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
24 days ago
B) Phased
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 months ago
A) Pilot
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elouise
2 months ago
A direct changeover in this situation would be a disaster. The existing system is being phased out, so the company can't afford any disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
Asuncion
12 days ago
D: Maybe a pilot or parallel running would be more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
14 days ago
C: Definitely, we need to consider a different implementation approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
1 months ago
B: Agreed, the existing system is being phased out, so we can't afford any disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
A: I think a direct changeover would be a disaster in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annalee
2 months ago
I believe a phased approach would be more suitable in this situation to ensure a smooth transition without disrupting operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
2 months ago
I agree with you. Direct changeover could be risky since the new system must be implemented before support for the existing system is withdrawn.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
3 months ago
I think the least appropriate implementation approach in this situation is direct changeover.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77