Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam CTFL4 Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CTFL4 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 3
[All CTFL4 Questions]

A software company decides to invest in reviews of various types. The thought process they have is that each artifact needs to be reviewed using only one of the review methods depending on the criticality of the artifact.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The state transition diagram provided shows three distinct states:

Waiting for fingerprint

Waiting for PIN

Valid PIN/ask menu selection

Each state represents a different stage in the system's operation, with transitions based on user actions and system responses.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Teddy
1 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Deciding the review method based on CMM level sounds like a great idea. It's like choosing the right tool for the job, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Annita
2 days ago
B) The thought process is correct. The whole company should decide on the review method based on their CMM level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
13 days ago
A) The thought process is incorrect. The whole company should adopt same standard for review of all artifacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D, but I'm worried it might lead to a case of 'analysis paralysis'. Reviewing the same artifact multiple times could be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
1 months ago
Option C is the correct answer. Reviewing the same artifact using different methods can actually provide a more comprehensive evaluation and identify a wider range of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 months ago
I disagree with Option A. Standardizing review methods across the entire company might not be the best approach, as different artifacts may require different levels of scrutiny.
upvoted 0 times
Mike
1 days ago
I think it depends on the criticality of the artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
7 days ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to have a standard approach for all reviews?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
8 days ago
Different artifacts may require different review methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
22 days ago
User 3: I agree with Izetta. We should consider the criticality of each artifact before deciding on the review method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
28 days ago
User 2: I disagree. Different artifacts may need different levels of scrutiny.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should standardize the review methods for all artifacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
Option B seems the most logical. The company should decide on the review method based on their CMM level to ensure consistency and efficiency across the organization.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
1 months ago
B) The thought process is correct. The whole company should decide or the review method based on their CMM level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
2 months ago
A) The thought process is incorrect. The whole company should adopt same standard for review of all artifacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
2 months ago
I agree with Maxima. It's important to tailor the review method to the specific artifact to ensure thorough evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
2 months ago
I disagree. I believe that each artifact should be reviewed using the most appropriate method, regardless of CMM level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
I think the thought process is correct. We should decide on the review method based on our CMM level.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77