Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam CISMP-V9 Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's CISMP-V9 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All CISMP-V9 Questions]

Which of the following describes a qualitative risk assessment approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Abel
1 months ago
Option A? More like option 'Eh, close enough.' Amirite, folks? Qualitative risk assessment, where the 'quality' is how well I can bullsh*t my way through it.
upvoted 0 times
Linsey
1 days ago
User 2: B) The use of verifiable data to predict the risk occurrence likelihood and the potential impact so as to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 days ago
B) The use of verifiable data to predict the risk occurrence likelihood and the potential impact so as to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
8 days ago
A) A subjective assessment of risk occurrence likelihood against the potential impact that determines the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
12 days ago
User 1: A) A subjective assessment of risk occurrence likelihood against the potential impact that determines the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nada
1 months ago
D, all the way. Risk tolerance and appetite? Sounds like they're trying to make this as complicated as possible. I'm just gonna go with my 'keep it simple, stupid' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Milly
13 days ago
B) The use of verifiable data to predict the risk occurrence likelihood and the potential impact so as to determine the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
15 days ago
D) The use of Risk Tolerance and Risk Appetite values to determine the overall severity of a risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 months ago
A) A subjective assessment of risk occurrence likelihood against the potential impact that determines the overall severity of a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
2 months ago
C, for sure! Monte-Carlo and LOPA? That's some high-level risk assessment stuff right there. I'm feeling fancy just reading it.
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
1 months ago
It's important to have a comprehensive approach when assessing risks, and these methods definitely help in that aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
1 months ago
I agree, using Monte-Carlo Analysis and LOPA definitely adds a sophisticated touch to risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Therese
2 months ago
B seems solid, using data to make informed decisions. That's my jam. Gotta love those verifiable facts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
2 months ago
Option A sounds like the way to go. I'm more of a 'gut feeling' kind of risk assessor, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
1 months ago
Bulah: I guess it all comes down to personal preference in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
1 months ago
User 3: I'm with you on that, Lucille. Option B sounds more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
User 2: I prefer using verifiable data, so option B is my choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like a more subjective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but A does sound like a subjective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
3 months ago
I agree with Twana, A makes sense for qualitative risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77