Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Avaya Exam 37820X Topic 4 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Avaya's 37820X exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 4
[All 37820X Questions]

Currently a customer has an IP500 V2 Preferred Edition deployment with SIP trunks at their office, but they plan to have 10 employees for tech support to work remotely within the next month. All 10 employees must be able to access their extension simultaneously. They ask you If the IP Office has built-in functionality for this and whether that Is sufficient from a security perspective.

Which solution would satisfy the customer's need for remote employees and security, and which additional licensing (if any) is required?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Charlene
20 days ago
I heard the IP Office has a built-in SBC that can handle remote workers, so I'm going to have to agree with Johnson on Option D. Although, I do wonder if the 'Teleworker' license includes a free 'Pajama Day' clause.
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
3 days ago
Haha, 'Pajama Day' clause would be a nice addition to the Teleworker license!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
7 days ago
I agree, the IP Office's built-in SBC seems reliable. The Teleworker licenses should cover the remote access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
8 days ago
I think Option D is the way to go. The built-in SBC should provide enough security for remote workers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurel
23 days ago
Option C is the way to go. Go big or go home, right? The customer wants security, and the SBCE and Advanced licenses will future-proof their setup. Just make sure to bill them for all the fancy acronyms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
28 days ago
I'm going to have to go with Option D. Why pay for extra licensing when the IP Office can handle it all out of the box? Plus, 'Teleworker' just sounds more fun than 'Standard' or 'Advanced'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 months ago
I'm not sure the built-in SBC will be enough for 10 simultaneous remote connections. Option A with the SBCE and Standard licenses might be the more robust solution, even if it's a bit more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaunda
5 days ago
Option A with the SBCE and Standard licenses is definitely the way to go for security and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brett
1 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward and cost-effective solution. The built-in SBC and firewall should provide sufficient security, and the Teleworker licenses are a good fit for the remote workers.
upvoted 0 times
Tenesha
9 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice. The built-in SBC and firewall should keep everything secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Weldon
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the licensing, but having an SBCE for security sounds like a good idea. Option A seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
2 months ago
I agree with you. The customer definitely needs the Standard Licenses for the remote workers to access their extensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. An SBCE will provide extra security for remote workers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77