Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Atlassian Exam ACP-610 Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Atlassian's ACP-610 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All ACP-610 Questions]

A team currently uses a single project to track both features and tasks. They will be adopting aqile practices, as follows:

* Features will be developed during three week iterations.

* Tasks will be handled based on priority and rank and released incrementally as needed.

they want to use agile boards with minimal disruption to their current configuration. Which solution will meet their requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

The solution that will meet the team's requirements of using agile boards with minimal disruption to their current configuration is to use a Kanban board for tasks and a Scrum board for features in the current project. This way, they can use different agile methodologies for different issue types without creating a new project or changing their existing configuration. They can use a Kanban board for tasks to handle them based on priority and rank and release them incrementally as needed. They can use a Scrum board for features to develop them during three week iterations with sprints and backlogs. The other solutions are either not feasible or not optimal for their needs. Therefore, the correct answer is E.Reference: [Creating a board], [Using a Scrum board], [Using a Kanban board]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Marge
14 days ago
But with option A, they can still track both features and tasks separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
17 days ago
I think option E is the way to go. Kanban for tasks and Scrum for features sounds like the perfect balance.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
4 days ago
I agree, having separate boards for tasks and features will help with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
19 days ago
I disagree, I believe option B would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
20 days ago
I think option A could work well for them.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77