Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Atlassian Exam ACP-100 Topic 1 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Atlassian's ACP-100 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 1
[All ACP-100 Questions]

One of your teams is maintaining and updating an application that has grown into three distinct modules.

The modules are on different release cycles. The team is struggling to track the versions of the modules,

because they have similar numbering schemes.

Which action would you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiraserver075/editing-a-project-key-935391076.html

by Leatha at Oct 18, 2023, 08:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACP-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Valentin
1 months ago
I don't know about you guys, but I'm already picturing the team members trying to keep track of the versions using a spreadsheet the size of a small country. Option B FTW!
upvoted 0 times
Lyla
3 days ago
B) Create a new Version field for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
15 days ago
A) Define an issue type for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noelia
1 months ago
Option A sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if creating an issue type for each module is the best solution. It might just add more complexity to the already complicated situation.
upvoted 0 times
Jeff
15 days ago
C) Split the modules into separate components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
19 days ago
B) Create a new Version field for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
1 months ago
A) Define an issue type for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xuan
2 months ago
This is a classic case of 'too many modules, not enough coffee.' Option C might be the answer, but then again, who am I to judge? I'm just here for the snacks.
upvoted 0 times
Claudia
2 days ago
D) Split the project into several projects, one for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
5 days ago
C) Split the modules into separate components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
12 days ago
B) Create a new Version field for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
14 days ago
C) Split the modules into separate components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
15 days ago
B) Create a new Version field for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
18 days ago
A) Define an issue type for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 months ago
A) Define an issue type for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ngoc
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Splitting the project into separate projects for each module might be a bit more work upfront, but it could provide a cleaner and more maintainable solution in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
2 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Creating a new Version field for each module would help us keep track of the different versions without having to overhaul the entire project structure.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
1 months ago
I agree. It's a simple solution that can make a big difference in tracking the modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. It would definitely make it easier to manage the different versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I prefer splitting the modules into separate components, it will make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
2 months ago
I agree with Oretha, it will help us track the versions more easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
I think we should create a new Version field for each module.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77