Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
ASTQB Discussions
Exam CTFL Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion
ASTQB Exam CTFL Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion
Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL Questions]
What if the project isn't big enough to justify extensive testing..?
A
Use risk based analysis to find out which areas need to be tested
B
Use automation tool for testing
C
Both a and b
D
None of the above
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
D
by
Loreta
at
Jan 05, 2023, 11:56 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Lea
2 months ago
Option C all the way! And if you're still not convinced, just tell your boss you need to 'automate the heck out of it.' That'll get their attention.
upvoted
0
times
Buddy
1 months ago
C) Both a and b
upvoted
0
times
...
Chanel
1 months ago
B) Use automation tool for testing
upvoted
0
times
...
Fatima
1 months ago
A) Use risk based analysis to find out which areas need to be tested
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Domitila
2 months ago
Option D? Really? What are they thinking? That's just lazy testing, if you ask me.
upvoted
0
times
...
Abel
2 months ago
I'd go with Option C as well. Doing everything manually for a small project sounds like a waste of time and effort.
upvoted
0
times
Goldie
2 days ago
I think using risk based analysis is a good idea
upvoted
0
times
...
Ciara
3 days ago
Manual testing can be time-consuming and may not be necessary for smaller projects.
upvoted
0
times
...
Camellia
20 days ago
It's important to prioritize testing efforts based on the project size and complexity.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mona
1 months ago
I agree, using risk based analysis and automation tools can save a lot of time.
upvoted
0
times
...
Gail
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most efficient choice for small projects.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Dick
2 months ago
I agree, a combination of risk assessment and automation is the way to go. Gotta make the most of limited resources, you know?
upvoted
0
times
...
Jackie
2 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice here. Risk-based analysis and automation tools can help optimize testing even for smaller projects.
upvoted
0
times
Geraldine
2 months ago
I agree, using both risk-based analysis and automation tools can help ensure that the most critical areas are tested efficiently.
upvoted
0
times
...
Laura
2 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice here. Risk-based analysis and automation tools can help optimize testing even for smaller projects.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Tony
2 months ago
But we can also use automation tools to speed up testing process.
upvoted
0
times
...
Sherell
2 months ago
I agree with Mike, focusing on high-risk areas is important.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mike
3 months ago
I think we should use risk based analysis to prioritize testing.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Lea
2 months agoBuddy
1 months agoChanel
1 months agoFatima
1 months agoDomitila
2 months agoAbel
2 months agoGoldie
2 days agoCiara
3 days agoCamellia
20 days agoMona
1 months agoGail
2 months agoDick
2 months agoJackie
2 months agoGeraldine
2 months agoLaura
2 months agoTony
2 months agoSherell
2 months agoMike
3 months ago