Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB Exam CTFL Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 3
[All CTFL Questions]

Which of the following, if observed in reviews and tests, would lead to problems (or conflict) within teams?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chaya
1 months ago
I've heard of 'critique the code, not the coder,' but 'critique the coder, not the coffee' is a new one. Let's keep things professional, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 months ago
Option C is spot on. Defects are about the software, not the developers. Hopefully, the developers have a sense of humor and can take a joke or two. Just kidding, kind of.
upvoted 0 times
Willie
5 days ago
C) Testers and reviewers communicate defects as criticism against persons and not against the software product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
8 days ago
B) Testers and reviewers are not qualified enough to find failures and faults.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
9 days ago
A) Testers and reviewers are not curious enough to find defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilda
1 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards B, but C makes more sense. Testers and reviewers need to be both qualified and able to provide constructive feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 months ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Tact and diplomacy are essential when conveying defects. Otherwise, it can lead to unnecessary conflict and hurt feelings.
upvoted 0 times
Jennifer
9 days ago
C) Testers and reviewers communicate defects as criticism against persons and not against the software product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
18 days ago
B) Testers and reviewers are not qualified enough to find failures and faults.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 months ago
A) Testers and reviewers are not curious enough to find defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coral
1 months ago
Option C is definitely the right answer. Defects should be communicated professionally, not as personal attacks. Team dynamics are crucial for effective software testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 months ago
I believe testers and reviewers should be open-minded and curious to find defects, rather than expecting developers to have already fixed everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
I agree with you, Verlene. It's important to focus on the software product and not blame individuals for defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
3 months ago
I think if testers and reviewers communicate defects as criticism against persons, it would definitely lead to conflicts within teams.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77