Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB Exam ASTQB Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's ASTQB exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All ASTQB Questions]

You are testing a native application for a smart phone. The application allows the user to make grocery lists on the phone and store up to three lists at a time. A list can contain up to 50 items.

Which of the following is the minimum set of test conditions to achieve 100% coverage with the equivalence partitioning test technique?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gregg
1 months ago
B is the answer, no doubt. Anything less and you're just asking for trouble. Though I do wonder if the developers were high when they decided on the 3-list limit. Must be some serious grocery hauls going on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 months ago
I'm thinking option C is the way to go. Why test for 51 items when the max is 50? And 7 lists saved? That's just overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Denae
19 hours ago
Exactly, we should focus on the valid ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
8 days ago
I agree, testing for 51 items doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
18 days ago
I agree, option C seems more focused on the relevant test conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
18 days ago
Option C seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharee
2 months ago
Option B for sure! Gotta test those extremes, you know? Can't have any 'oops, my app crashed because I tried to save 4 lists' moments.
upvoted 0 times
Angelica
2 days ago
Let's go with Option B then, it seems like the most comprehensive choice for testing the app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
4 days ago
Option B covers all the necessary test conditions to achieve 100% coverage with equivalence partitioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
1 months ago
Definitely, we need to make sure the app can handle saving different numbers of lists and items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 months ago
I agree, testing the extremes is important to ensure the app can handle all scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ariel
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'd go with option B - it seems to cover all the edge cases, including the valid range of list items and the max number of saved lists.
upvoted 0 times
Margarett
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for achieving 100% coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 months ago
I think option B covers all the necessary test conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Madelyn
2 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option B provides more comprehensive coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C covers the key scenarios without unnecessary duplication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
2 months ago
I think the minimum set of test conditions should cover all possible scenarios, so I would go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77