Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ Exam CSQE Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CSQE exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 3
[All CSQE Questions]

Which of the following software metrics is based on a nominal scale-1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When a defect is discovered during the test phase, the earliest phase in the software lifecycle that could need rework to resolve the defect is often the requirements phase because:

Root Cause Analysis: Many defects originate from misunderstandings or errors in the initial requirements. If the requirements are incorrect or incomplete, it will affect all subsequent phases.

Impact on Design and Implementation: Incorrect requirements lead to flawed design and implementation, necessitating rework in these phases as well.

Cost of Fixing Defects: The cost and effort to fix defects increase exponentially the later they are found in the development lifecycle. Addressing issues at the requirements stage is more cost-effective.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cristy
1 months ago
If the answer isn't B, I'm going to have a major defect with the exam writer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 months ago
I'm just hoping the correct answer isn't 'the number of coffee stains on the tester's keyboard' - that would be a real nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
6 days ago
A) Root cause of defect, logic error data definition, etc
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavera
1 months ago
B has got to be the answer. Severity rankings like critical, major, and minor are textbook examples of a nominal scale metric.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
1 days ago
Definitely B. Severity levels like critical and major fit the criteria for nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
13 days ago
Yes, B makes sense. It's a clear example of a nominal scale metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
16 days ago
I agree, B is the correct answer. Severity rankings are definitely based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to have to go with D. Defect discovery rate, because it's a count per unit of time.
upvoted 0 times
Apolonia
9 days ago
User 3: I agree with the original user, D seems like the best choice. Defect discovery rate is a count per unit of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
13 days ago
User 2: I'm not sure, but I'm leaning towards C. Defect density seems like it could be based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 months ago
User 1: I think it's B. Severing of a defect sounds like it's based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carol
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. All the options seem related to defects, but I'll go with C. Defect density sounds like a nominal scale metric.
upvoted 0 times
Portia
9 hours ago
User 2: I'm not sure, but I'll go with D. Defect discovery rate seems like it could be based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 months ago
User 1: I think it's B. Severing of a defect sounds like a nominal scale metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anika
2 months ago
I think the answer is B. Severity of a defect is based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
Raina
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, severity of a defect is definitely based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
2 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is B. Severity of a defect is based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alverta
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I can see how defect density would be based on a nominal scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Defect density: number per function point, etc.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Severing of a defect, critical, major, minor, etc.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77