Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ Exam CSQE Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CSQE exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 2
[All CSQE Questions]

Which of the following actions is designed to prevent future defects?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A Kiviat chart, also known as a radar or spider chart, is well-suited for presenting a summary view of a set of metrics that include an ideal value because:

Multi-Dimensional Data Representation: It allows for the visualization of multiple metrics simultaneously, each represented as an axis starting from the same point.

Comparison with Ideal Values: Ideal values can be plotted on the same chart, providing a clear visual comparison between actual performance and target goals.

Holistic View: This type of chart provides a comprehensive overview of performance across different metrics in a single, easily interpretable visual.


by Felicidad at Sep 13, 2024, 11:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSQE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jaclyn
28 days ago
Injecting defects to test a system? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
29 days ago
Reverse-engineering a defective system? That's like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube. C is the way to go for preventing future issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 months ago
A, using white-box testing, could help identify potential defects early in the development process. But I don't think it's the best way to prevent future defects.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
9 days ago
A) Using white-box testing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eric
1 months ago
D? Really? Injecting defects to test a system seems like a great way to create more problems, not prevent them!
upvoted 0 times
Elizabeth
7 days ago
Definitely not D! Injecting defects is not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
17 days ago
C) Conducting a causal analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
29 days ago
A) Using white-box testing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joaquin
2 months ago
Hmm, I think C is the correct answer. Conducting a causal analysis to understand the root cause of defects is a proactive approach to prevent them in the future.
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
24 days ago
Injecting defects to test a system sounds counterproductive, it can create more issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
1 months ago
Using white-box testing can also be effective in catching defects early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
1 months ago
Definitely, it helps in identifying the root cause of the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I agree, conducting a causal analysis is crucial to prevent future defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bea
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but injecting defects to test a system doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
3 months ago
I agree with Ronald, causal analysis helps identify root causes of defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
3 months ago
I think conducting a causal analysis is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77