ASQ Exam CQE Topic 8 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQE exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 8

[All CQE Questions]

In a failure mode and effects analysis (FXIEA). the focus should be on

Aclassifying as failures those items with risk priority numbers greater than 100

Bcreating flowchans for the items with high risk priority number or occurrence values

Cimplementing corrective action on items that have high alpha risk values

Dimplementing corrective action on items that have high risk priority number or severity values

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Amber at Aug 09, 2023, 05:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Candida

1 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with Option D on this one. Implementing corrective action on high-risk items is the whole point of a FMEA, isn't it? Unless, of course, you're a fan of just letting things fail. *cue dramatic music*

upvoted 0 times

Oliva

9 days ago

It's all about taking action on those high-risk items to avoid potential problems down the line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abel

12 days ago

I agree, focusing on items with high risk priority numbers or severity values is crucial for preventing failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

16 days ago

Option D is definitely the way to go. We need to address those high-risk items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reynalda

1 months ago

Ha! Clearly, the answer is Option A. Who doesn't love a good failure classification? That's the real meat and potatoes of a FMEA, right? *wink wink*

upvoted 0 times

Ludivina

2 days ago

Actually, I believe Option C is the best choice. Implementing corrective action on items with high alpha risk values is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

3 days ago

I disagree, Option B is more important. Creating flowcharts for high risk items can help visualize the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

1 months ago

I think Option D is the way to go. Corrective action on high risk priority or severity items is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Shouldn't we be looking at the overall risk rather than just the priority number or severity? I think Option B might be a better approach.

upvoted 0 times

Gerardo

20 days ago

User 3: I think implementing corrective action on items with high risk priority number or severity values is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janella

1 months ago

User 2: I agree, but maybe we should also consider creating flowcharts for items with high risk priority numbers or occurrence values.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mindy

1 months ago

User 1: I think we should focus on classifying failures with risk priority numbers greater than 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margret

2 months ago

Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values makes the most sense for a FMEA.

upvoted 0 times

Jolene

11 days ago

By addressing items with high-risk priority numbers or severity values, we can improve overall system reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

12 days ago

Implementing corrective action on high-risk items can help prevent failures in the future.

upvoted 0 times

...

Milly

15 days ago

It's important to prioritize corrective action on items that pose the highest risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

22 days ago

I agree, focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values is crucial for FMEA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

27 days ago

Absolutely, it helps in ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to mitigate the most significant risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bong

1 months ago

That way, we can address the most critical issues first and prevent potential failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

1 months ago

It's important to prioritize corrective action on items that pose the highest risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anabel

2 months ago

I agree, focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values is crucial for FMEA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

2 months ago

But what about classifying failures with risk priority numbers greater than 100? Shouldn't that be a priority too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

3 months ago

I agree with Paz. It's important to address the items that pose the highest risk first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

3 months ago

I think the focus should be on implementing corrective action on items with high risk priority number or severity values.

upvoted 0 times

...