Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ Exam CQA Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All CQA Questions]

Which of the following is an audit reporting technique for prioritizing audit findings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Catherin at May 28, 2024, 10:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Amber
1 months ago
Cognitive dissonance? That's the theory where people get all weird and defensive when their beliefs are challenged. Definitely not an audit reporting technique!
upvoted 0 times
Audria
8 days ago
A) Weibull distribution
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alberto
2 months ago
Wait, is the Weibull distribution related to that weird probability distribution I learned about in stats class? I'm just going to go with my gut and say the risk-benefit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
Amie
23 days ago
Yeah, the Ishikawa diagram is more for identifying root causes of problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
29 days ago
I agree, the risk-benefit ratio is a better choice for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
1 months ago
I think the Weibull distribution is more about reliability analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Destiny
2 months ago
The Ishikawa diagram is a tool for root cause analysis, not prioritizing audit findings. I'm going with the risk-benefit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
Rebeca
23 days ago
The Weibull distribution and cognitive dissonance are not relevant for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
29 days ago
I think the risk-benefit ratio is a good choice for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 months ago
I agree, the Ishikawa diagram is for root cause analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Genevieve
2 months ago
Cognitive dissonance? Really? I don't think that's what we're looking for here. Ishikawa diagram sounds more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
5 days ago
Weibull distribution might not be as relevant as Ishikawa diagram for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
8 days ago
Cognitive dissonance doesn't seem like the right choice for audit reporting techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
16 days ago
I think Risk-benefit ratio could also be helpful in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 months ago
I agree, Ishikawa diagram is a useful tool for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Agustin
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Weibull distribution, but the risk-benefit ratio seems like a logical way to prioritize audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
29 days ago
I think the Ishikawa diagram could also be helpful in organizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
1 months ago
I agree, the risk-benefit ratio is a practical approach to prioritize audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Risk-benefit ratio could also be a valid technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
2 months ago
I agree with Linwood, Ishikawa diagram helps in prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Ishikawa diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77