Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ Exam CQA Topic 6 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 6
[All CQA Questions]

To determine whether a finding is a minor, isolated incident or a serious, chronic problem, an auditor should consult with the

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Malcolm
2 months ago
I don't know, guys. Maybe we should ask the janitor. They probably have a better idea of what's really going on than any of those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
2 months ago
The quality assurance inspector? Really? That's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse. The audit team is clearly the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
15 days ago
Consulting with the auditee's quality assurance inspector might not give us the most accurate information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
28 days ago
I agree, the audit team would provide an unbiased assessment of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 months ago
Audit team is definitely the best choice. They have the expertise to determine the severity of the finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the client should be involved in this decision. That could introduce some bias. The audit team is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Latonia
16 days ago
Consulting with the auditee's quality assurance inspector could also provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
17 days ago
The audit team would be the best choice to determine the seriousness of the finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
28 days ago
I agree, involving the client could definitely introduce bias.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
2 months ago
I think the auditee's department manager would be the best person to consult. They have the most intimate knowledge of the operations and can provide valuable context.
upvoted 0 times
Magnolia
2 days ago
I think the auditee's department manager would be the best person to consult.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
5 days ago
I think it's important to consult with both the department manager and the audit team to get a well-rounded view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
6 days ago
That's true, the audit team would have a more objective perspective on the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
17 days ago
But wouldn't the audit team also be a good resource to consult with?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
2 months ago
I agree, the department manager would have the most insight into the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cornell
2 months ago
The auditor should consult with the audit team to determine the severity of the finding. They have the necessary expertise and objectivity to make that assessment.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
2 months ago
Let's make sure to involve them in the decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
2 months ago
I agree, the audit team is the best resource for evaluating the seriousness of the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 months ago
Yes, they have the expertise and objectivity to make that assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
2 months ago
We should consult with the audit team to determine the severity of the finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) client. The client would know the context of the findings better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
3 months ago
I agree with Franklyn. The audit team would have a better understanding of the overall findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) audit team.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77