Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASIS Exam PSP Topic 7 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 7
[All PSP Questions]

In which approach of comparative negligence, the plaintiff may collect something for injuries even if he or she was primarily responsible for the injuries?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Mariann at Apr 27, 2024, 04:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cortney
1 months ago
This question is making my head spin. I just want to collect my paycheck, not get into the nitty-gritty of comparative negligence. Can we move on to the next question, please?
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
2 months ago
I'm going with the 50/50 rule. It just seems the most fair, you know? Plus, it's got a nice symmetry to it. Who doesn't love a good 50/50 split?
upvoted 0 times
Mammie
8 days ago
I agree, the 50/50 rule does have a nice symmetry to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
10 days ago
I prefer the pure approach, but I see your point about the 50/50 rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
26 days ago
I think the 50/50 rule is a good choice. It does seem fair.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? 'None of the above' seems too easy, but I can't figure out the right answer. Hmm, this is a tough one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
The 51 percent rule seems like the right answer - the plaintiff can only collect if they were less than 51% responsible, right? That's what I'm going with.
upvoted 0 times
Ngoc
17 days ago
I agree, the 51 percent rule is the approach where the plaintiff can still receive compensation as long as they were less than 51% responsible for the injuries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
Yeah, that's correct. It allows for some recovery even if the plaintiff was mostly at fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
1 months ago
I think you're right, the 51 percent rule is the one where the plaintiff can still collect if they were less than 51% responsible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
2 months ago
Well, I think in the Pure approach, the plaintiff can still collect damages even if they were mostly at fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
I think the pure approach sounds like the one where the plaintiff can collect something even if they were mostly responsible. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Stacey
18 days ago
I don't think any of the approaches are perfect, there are always pros and cons to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
22 days ago
I prefer the 51 percent rule, it seems like a good balance between the pure approach and the 50/50 rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
1 months ago
I think the 50/50 rule is more fair, where the plaintiff can only collect if they were less than 50% responsible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
2 months ago
I agree, the pure approach allows the plaintiff to collect something even if they were mostly responsible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alishia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 51 percent rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Pure approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
2 months ago
But in the Pure approach, even if the plaintiff is mostly at fault, they can still collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 51 percent rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Pure approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77