Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASIS Exam PSP Topic 7 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam

Question #: 86
Topic #: 7

[All PSP Questions]

In which approach of comparative negligence, the plaintiff may collect something for injuries even if he or she was primarily responsible for the injuries?

APure approach

B50/50 rule

C51 percent rule

DNone of the above

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Mariann at Apr 27, 2024, 04:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Francesco

52 minutes ago

The 51 percent rule seems like the right answer - the plaintiff can only collect if they were less than 51% responsible, right? That's what I'm going with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

10 days ago

Well, I think in the Pure approach, the plaintiff can still collect damages even if they were mostly at fault.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

17 days ago

I think the pure approach sounds like the one where the plaintiff can collect something even if they were mostly responsible. That makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

17 days ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 51 percent rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

18 days ago

I think the answer is A) Pure approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brinda

19 days ago

But in the Pure approach, even if the plaintiff is mostly at fault, they can still collect damages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

21 days ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 51 percent rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brinda

25 days ago

I think the answer is A) Pure approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77