What would be the result of issuing a reload command on one of the two switches peered together in an MLAG domain where both switches are running EOS version 4.14.1F?
I'm going with A. Losing 50% of network capacity sounds like a nightmare, but it's better than the peer switch rebooting and taking down the whole network, right?
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be C. The peer switch sends out gratuitous BPDUs to let the network know that it has assumed the root-bridge role.
I don't know, man. These MLAG questions always confuse me. Maybe D is the right answer - nothing bad ever happens with MLAG, right? That's what the marketing says, at least.
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is B. When one MLAG switch reboots, the peer also reboots to ensure network stability. I've seen this happen in production before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Alfred
2 days agoDaniela
5 days agoMary
8 days agoDallas
8 days agoHannah
10 days agoSunshine
12 days agoStanton
17 days ago