Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education Exam S90.08 Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.08 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 1
[All S90.08 Questions]

Which of the following does not make sense when considering the contents of a technical service contract for a SOAP-based Web service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Adelina at Nov 18, 2024, 06:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.08 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marcelle
1 months ago
Wait, are we sure the Legacy Wrapper pattern is the right answer? I thought that was how we did things back in the '90s.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
2 months ago
The Legacy Wrapper pattern is the obvious choice here. Who doesn't love a good old-fashioned legacy system wrapped in a SOAP service?
upvoted 0 times
Augustine
5 days ago
C) The application of the Policy Centralization pattern eliminates redundancy and inconsistency by creating a single, master policy bound to the WSDL definition of every service in a service inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
6 days ago
User 4: I think the Decoupled Contract pattern is useful for separating the service contract from implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
8 days ago
User 3: The Schema Centralization pattern also sounds important for defining data models in SOAP messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
16 days ago
User 2: Definitely, it helps standardize the technical service contract for easier integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
24 days ago
B) The Schema Centralization pattern supports the creation of independent data models that define data transmitted in SOAP messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
27 days ago
A) The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be used to expose a legacy system as a SOAP-based Web service with a standardized technical service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, the Legacy Wrapper pattern is a great option for exposing legacy systems as SOAP services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlesetta
2 months ago
I don't know, the Policy Centralization pattern sounds like it would be useful too. Consistency is key in a service-oriented architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
2 months ago
The Decoupled Contract pattern is definitely the correct answer. It's important to keep the service contract independent from the implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
2 months ago
The Schema Centralization pattern makes sense to me. Separating the data models from the service implementation seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
Beata
24 days ago
D) The Legacy Wrapper pattern can be used to expose a legacy system as a SOAP-based Web service with a standardized technical service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
27 days ago
B) The Decoupled Contract pattern results in the separation of the service contract from the service implementation, allowing the service contract to be independently designed and governed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
28 days ago
A) The Schema Centralization pattern supports the creation of independent data models that define data transmitted in SOAP messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 months ago
C) The application of the Policy Centralization pattern eliminates redundancy and inconsistency by creating a single, master policy bound to the WSDL definition of every service in a service inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
1 months ago
B) The Decoupled Contract pattern results in the separation of the service contract from the service implementation, allowing the service contract to be independently designed and governed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 months ago
A) The Schema Centralization pattern supports the creation of independent data models that define data transmitted in SOAP messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
2 months ago
I agree with Trinidad. Option C seems like a valid approach to ensure consistency in service contracts for SOAP-based Web services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
I disagree with Stephanie. Option C actually makes sense because having a single, master policy can help eliminate redundancy and inconsistency in service contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
I think option C does not make sense because it doesn't relate to the technical service contract for a SOAP-based Web service.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77