Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.02 Topic 5 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 5
[All S90.02 Questions]

Identify what is wrong with the following statement: "I have a single Calculator component that provides basic math functions. I'm exposing this component as a component-based service for internal service consumers that are also component-based. I'm exposing this component as a SOAP-based Web service for internal and external service consumers that support SOAP messaging. I'm also exposing this component as a REST service for external service consumers that prefer to access its functions via HTTP methods. I'm also exposing this component as a service agent for service consumers that support explicit invocation via a service contract." SELECT ALL THAT APPLY

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Huey
1 months ago
The REST part is a red flag. The uniform contract required by REST doesn't support arbitrary HTTP methods, only the standard GET, POST, PUT, DELETE. This is just a mess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
1 months ago
Ha! The statement mentions 'service agent', but that's clearly the wrong term. Service agents are event-driven, not explicitly invoked. Whoever wrote this is a bit confused.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
10 days ago
Definitely, using the term 'service agent' in that context is misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
18 days ago
It seems like the person who wrote that statement needs to clarify their understanding of service agents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
28 days ago
Yeah, service agents are not explicitly invoked, they are event-driven.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 months ago
I agree, the term 'service agent' is definitely used incorrectly in that statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
2 months ago
SOAP and REST are different architectural styles, you can't mix them like that. Exposing the same component in both ways is just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
A single component cannot handle all those service types at once. That's way too much responsibility for one component.
upvoted 0 times
Joye
12 days ago
Having a single component handle multiple types of services can lead to complexity and potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
13 days ago
Agreed, it's important to keep components focused on a specific type of service for better clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
14 days ago
That's true, a single component should focus on one type of service to avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
17 days ago
Having one component handle all those service types could lead to maintenance and scalability issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
23 days ago
I agree, it's better to separate concerns and have different components for different types of services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 months ago
It's true, a single component shouldn't be exposed in so many different ways.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
3 months ago
D) Service agents are event-driven and are therefore not explicitly invoked via a service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
3 months ago
B) SOAP-based Web service consumer programs cannot be both internally and externally located.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
3 months ago
A) A single component cannot be exposed as a component-based service, a SOAP-based Web service and a REST service at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a