Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education Exam S90.02 Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All S90.02 Questions]

Which of the following statements does not make sense? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Shawna at Dec 13, 2023, 06:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Joesph
1 months ago
Option B, for sure. Sharing a WSDL definition across multiple schemas? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Talk about a coding nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 months ago
Option D? Really? All of those statements make sense? Clearly, the person who wrote this question has never actually built a web service before.
upvoted 0 times
Olen
13 days ago
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
29 days ago
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
30 days ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherita
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with option B as the correct answer. Sharing a WSDL definition across multiple XML schemas? Sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Reita
13 days ago
User 3: Option A seems more logical, with shared XML schema for multiple WSDL definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, sharing a WSDL definition across multiple XML schemas doesn't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, option B definitely doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coleen
2 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
2 months ago
I agree, option B is the odd one out here. The rest seem to be valid statements about web services and XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
21 days ago
I think you're right. The other options all describe valid scenarios for building web services and XML schemas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
25 days ago
Option B is definitely the odd one out. It doesn't make sense to have two XML schemas shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
26 days ago
B) I built 3 XML schemas, two of which are being shared by the same WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 months ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
2 months ago
Option B doesn't make sense. You can't have a WSDL definition sharing the same XML schema, that's just not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
18 days ago
D) Yeah, option B is definitely incorrect. It doesn't follow the standard structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
26 days ago
C) I built 3 WSDL definitions and 3 XML schemas. Each WSDL definition is associated with its own XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 months ago
B) I agree, option B doesn't make sense. You can't have a WSDL definition sharing the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
A) I built 3 SOAP-based Web services, each of which has its own published WSDL definition. 2 of the WSDL definitions share the same XML schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77