Arcitura Education Exam S90.02 Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 1

I would like to add two different WS-Policy definitions to my SOAP-based Web service and I would like to give the service consumer the choice to comply to either policy. How can I do this? Select the correct answer.

ACreate a separate XML schema for each policy and attach both XML schemas to the service's WSDL definition.

BCreate the two separate policies and group them in a policy alternative that is then associated with the service's WSDL definition.

CCommunicate each policy through a separate WS-Addressing SOAP header and let the service consumer choose which header to use.

DYou cannot do this.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Norah at Oct 26, 2022, 05:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Noelia

1 months ago

I heard you can also achieve this by creating two separate web services and flipping a coin to decide which one to call. Highly efficient, I know.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

1 months ago

B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?

upvoted 0 times

Louvenia

18 days ago

B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

23 days ago

B) Create the two separate policies and group them in a policy alternative that is then associated with the service's WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

29 days ago

A) Create a separate XML schema for each policy and attach both XML schemas to the service's WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

1 months ago

D? Really? That's like saying I can't have two flavors of ice cream. Of course I can, and B is how I do it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestine

1 months ago

I was about to pick C, but then I realized that WS-Addressing headers are for a different purpose. B makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

Oren

6 days ago

User 3: B makes sense, let's go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

9 days ago

User 2: I agree, B seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

11 days ago

User 1: I think B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work if we attach both XML schemas to the WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheal

2 months ago

B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

Felix

14 days ago

Definitely. It's a good way to handle multiple policy options in a SOAP-based Web service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

15 days ago

That makes sense. It gives flexibility to the consumer while keeping the implementation clean.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

25 days ago

That makes sense. It's good to give the service consumer the flexibility to choose which policy to comply with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elroy

1 months ago

Yes, I agree. It allows the service consumer to choose which policy to comply with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

1 months ago

I think the answer is B. Grouping the policies in a policy alternative seems like the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

1 months ago

B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamika

2 months ago

I agree with Leonida, option B makes sense because it allows for grouping the policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonida

2 months ago

I think the correct answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...