A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? Sounds about as exciting as watching paint dry. I'd rather be stuck in a room with a bunch of IT consultants, honestly.
B and C seem like the obvious choices here. Who wants a tech architecture that's going to be outdated in no time? And leveraging new tech to meet business requirements is kind of the point.
B) Avoid establishing a technology architecture that will need to be replaced in the near future when it no longer adequately fulfills business requirements.
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
I think D is the correct answer. A flexible, adaptable technology architecture is crucial to keep up with evolving business needs. That's the whole point of SOA, right?
A? Really? That's the complete opposite of what we want in a service-oriented architecture. A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? No way, that's a recipe for disaster!
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
Weldon
1 months agoArthur
1 months agoPedro
5 days agoNoah
9 days agoLeonora
1 months agoRoy
2 days agoEdelmira
7 days agoJosphine
22 days agoLonna
1 months agoWade
8 days agoTeddy
2 months agoCaitlin
27 days agoQuentin
1 months agoMargret
2 months agoMilly
2 months agoMargret
2 months ago