Appian Exam Appian Certified Senior Developer Topic 9 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's Appian Certified Senior Developer exam

Question #: 18
Topic #: 9

[All Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions]

Which review format is the most efficient way to coach team members and improve code quality? (Choose the best answer.)

APeer Dev Review

BAutomated Code Scanning

CRetrospectives

DUser Acceptance Testing

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Ernest at Oct 18, 2023, 09:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aracelis

1 months ago

Peer Dev Review is the way to go, but I'd also recommend a few beers to make it more fun. Code reviews and happy hours, that's the recipe for success!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

1 months ago

User Acceptance Testing? Really? That's like trying to fix a car by kicking the tires.

upvoted 0 times

Brett

17 days ago

C) Retrospectives

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

1 months ago

B) Automated Code Scanning

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

1 months ago

A) Peer Dev Review

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

2 months ago

Automated Code Scanning is the most efficient option. It can catch issues early and save us a lot of time and effort.

upvoted 0 times

Gwen

23 days ago

User Acceptance Testing is crucial for ensuring the code meets the requirements of the end users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

1 months ago

Retrospectives can be helpful for reflecting on the process and making improvements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 months ago

I agree, Peer Dev Review is also important for getting feedback from team members.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

1 months ago

Automated Code Scanning is definitely the way to go. It helps catch issues early on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

2 months ago

I'm a big fan of Retrospectives. They give us a chance to reflect on what went well and what we can improve for the next sprint.

upvoted 0 times

Essie

1 months ago

I prefer Peer Dev Review because it allows for direct feedback from team members.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

1 months ago

Retrospectives are great for reflecting on our work and making improvements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franchesca

2 months ago

I believe Retrospectives are crucial for improving code quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

2 months ago

Peer Dev Review is definitely the way to go! It's a great way to get direct feedback from team members and improve the code together.

upvoted 0 times

Aretha

15 days ago

Yes, Peer Dev Review is definitely a valuable tool for improving code quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

16 days ago

A) Peer Dev Review

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonie

19 days ago

Retrospectives are good for reflecting on the process, but Peer Dev Review is more hands-on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

21 days ago

C) Retrospectives

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivory

1 months ago

Automated Code Scanning can also be helpful for catching certain types of issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tish

1 months ago

B) Automated Code Scanning

upvoted 0 times

...

Carol

1 months ago

I agree, Peer Dev Review allows for direct feedback and collaboration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

2 months ago

A) Peer Dev Review

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

2 months ago

I prefer Automated Code Scanning for efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

2 months ago

I think Peer Dev Review is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...