Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian Exam Appian Certified Senior Developer Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's Appian Certified Senior Developer exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions]

You are designing a case management application. The initiator creates a case, and the reviewer reviews it approximately 7 days later.

You have already designed a process model for the initiators to create the case.

Which process model design will result in the lowest memory impact? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cheryll
2 months ago
Ha! I bet the memory impact of Option A would be like trying to fit a rhinoceros into a sardine can. Gotta go with something more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Kallie
5 days ago
I think Option D might be a better choice for lower memory impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
8 days ago
I agree, we should go with a more efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
29 days ago
Option A sounds like it would take up a lot of memory.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C with the Start Process node sounds like it might be overkill for this use case. Let's see what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
16 hours ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Assigning a task to the reviewer directly could streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
2 days ago
I agree, option A seems like the most efficient choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense. It keeps things simple and doesn't add unnecessary steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nida
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Using a Sub-Process node allows for better modularity and scalability, which could be important for a case management application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most efficient choice. By assigning a task directly to the reviewer, the memory impact should be lower compared to initializing a separate process model.
upvoted 0 times
Joanne
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, assigning a task directly to the reviewer seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dino
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more efficient in terms of memory usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice because it separates the review process model for the reviewer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
I think option A will result in the lowest memory impact.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77