Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian Exam Appian Certified Senior Developer Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's Appian Certified Senior Developer exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions]

You need to insert the deleted row of a table into a history table for audit purposes.

What is the most efficient method to achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annett
2 months ago
I was about to suggest a view, but then I realized that's just a transparent window to the data, not a way to actually store the history. Trigger is the clear winner here. Unless, of course, you want to add some spice and go with a process model. You know, really make things complicated.
upvoted 0 times
Ulysses
2 days ago
Process model might be too complicated for just inserting a deleted row into a history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
3 days ago
Materialized view won't work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 days ago
I agree, Trigger will allow you to automatically insert the deleted row into the history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
14 days ago
I think Trigger is the best option for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
19 days ago
Trigger it is then, thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
23 days ago
Yeah, Trigger would definitely be the way to go for inserting the deleted row into a history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
29 days ago
I agree, Trigger would be the most efficient method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
1 months ago
I think Trigger is the best option for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
2 months ago
A trigger is definitely the way to go here. It's like a ninja in the shadows, silently recording every row that gets deleted. Efficient and stealthy, my kind of solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 months ago
A materialized view? Really? That seems a bit overkill for just keeping a history of deleted rows. I'd go with the good old trigger approach.
upvoted 0 times
Miesha
25 days ago
I think a trigger is the way to go as well. It's a simple and effective solution for auditing purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
28 days ago
I agree, a trigger would be the most efficient method for inserting the deleted row into a history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mike
2 months ago
Hmm, I think a trigger would be the most efficient way to handle this. Automatically inserting the deleted row into a history table seems like a pretty straightforward use case for a trigger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
2 months ago
I personally think a Materialized view could also be a good option for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
I agree with Filiberto, using a Trigger would be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
3 months ago
I think the most efficient method would be using a Trigger.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77