Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam Change-Management-Foundation Topic 1 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Change-Management-Foundation exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 1
[All Change-Management-Foundation Questions]

Which of the following statements about positive characteristics of an effective change team (Lencioni) are true?

1. Members should be encouraged to draw attention to colleagues' failures to meet commitments

2. Conflict should be avoided to maintain good relationships

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth

Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model, referenced in the APMG Change Management Foundation, outlines characteristics of effective teams by identifying dysfunctions to avoid: Absence of Trust, Fear of Conflict, Lack of Commitment, Avoidance of Accountability, and Inattention to Results. Let's analyze each statement against Lencioni's positive traits:

* Statement 1: 'Members should be encouraged to draw attention to colleagues' failures to meet commitments' -- This relates to accountability, a positive trait in Lencioni's model. Effective teams hold each other accountable, addressing underperformance constructively to maintain standards. However, the phrasing 'draw attention to failures' suggests blame rather than Lencioni's emphasis on supportive, team-focused accountability (e.g., ''How can we help you meet this?''). In practice, effective teams discuss commitments openly but not punitively, making this statement misleadingly negative and thus false in the strict context of Lencioni's intent.

* Statement 2: 'Conflict should be avoided to maintain good relationships' -- This is false. Lencioni argues that avoiding conflict (Fear of Conflict) prevents healthy debate and resolution, weakening team performance. Effective change teams embrace constructive conflict to challenge ideas and reach better decisions. For example, debating a change strategy's risks ensures a robust plan, whereas avoiding conflict might preserve harmony at the expense of quality.

Since Statement 1 misrepresents accountability's tone and Statement 2 contradicts Lencioni's advocacy for conflict, neither is true. Option D reflects the APMG interpretation of Lencioni's model, where trust, constructive conflict, and mutual accountability define effective teams.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77