Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam AgilePM-Practitioner Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Which 2 actions should the Team Leader take to implement the new Must

Have requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Louisa
10 months ago
B and C are the way to go. Gotta make sure the Timebox and dependencies are all sorted out before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
10 months ago
C) Discuss the development interfaces and dependencies with the Solution Development Team to ensure the associated Timebox is appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
10 months ago
B) Add the additional tasks required to create the financial transaction functionality to the Timebox Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melvin
11 months ago
Hey, at least they didn't ask us to 'source and hire a web developer with experience in developing online financial transaction functionality.' That would be way too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
11 months ago
Consolidating the agenda might be a good first step, but I think B and C are the most important actions to take. Can't forget the financial transaction functionality!
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
10 months ago
Consolidating the agenda is important, but focusing on the financial transaction functionality is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
10 months ago
Yes, those actions will ensure the new Must Have requirement is implemented successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
10 months ago
I agree, adding the additional tasks and discussing development interfaces are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malinda
11 months ago
I think we should also consider de-scoping Should Have and/or Could Have requirements to make room for the new Must Have functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
11 months ago
Discussing development interfaces with the Solution Development Team is important to ensure the Timebox is appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
11 months ago
I agree with Devorah. Adding the additional tasks to the Timebox Plan is also crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
I would go with B and D. Adding the tasks to the Timebox is a must, and we'll need to de-scope some lower-priority requirements to make room for the new one.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
10 months ago
That's a good point. Let's focus on what's most important for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
10 months ago
We might have to de-scope some lower-priority requirements to make it work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
11 months ago
Agree, that's a priority. We can't miss that deadline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
I think we should definitely add the tasks to the Timebox plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phuong
12 months ago
B and C seem like the most logical steps to me. Adding the new tasks to the Timebox Plan and discussing the development interfaces with the team are key to implementing the new requirement effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Nakisha
11 months ago
Yes, and we also need to discuss the development interfaces with the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
11 months ago
I think we should add the new tasks to the Timebox Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
12 months ago
I think the Team Leader should consolidate and circulate an agenda for the workshop.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77