Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam AgilePM-Practitioner Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Answer the following questions about the acceptance criteria within the project.

Decide whether the approach to setting and using acceptance criteria has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.

During Solution Development Timebox A, a new Health and Safety requirement arises: the front door is required to have wheelchair access. This is a legal requirement and is a Must Have before any staff or general public access can be allowed. The Solution Development Team will work with the Local Planning Authority Officer, the specialist who identified the requirement, to identify further acceptance criteria for Solution Development Timebox A.

Is this an appropriate action related to acceptance criteria?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A . Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.

Rationale:

Agile Project Management is adaptable to changes, even late in the development process. The introduction of a new Health and Safety requirement, such as wheelchair access, which is a legal and must-have requirement, needs to be incorporated into the project as soon as it is identified. Working with the Local Planning Authority Officer to define acceptance criteria ensures that the requirement is clearly understood and that the solution developed meets the necessary legal standards. This approach ensures that the team can immediately address the new requirement and integrate it into the current work cycle, aligning with Agile's principle of welcoming changing requirements, even late in development, for the customer's competitive advantage.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Levi
29 days ago
I'll throw in a wild card and say A. Safety first, even if it means a little extra work. Gotta keep those wheelchairs rolling!
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
6 days ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
15 days ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
1 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with D. The Business Visionary should be the one calling the shots on acceptance criteria, not some random planning officer.
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
17 days ago
D) No, because the Business Visionary is responsible for defining acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
2 months ago
I'm going with C. This new requirement wasn't in the original list, so it shouldn't need acceptance criteria. That's just more bureaucracy.
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
12 days ago
C) No, because this new requirement would NOT be included in the original Prioritised Requirements List and therefore does NOT need acceptance criteria to be defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
19 days ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
25 days ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brock
2 months ago
B seems like the right choice to me. The Local Planning Authority Officer is the expert, so they should be involved in defining the acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
29 days ago
Yes, it's important to have the right people involved in setting acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 months ago
I agree, involving the expert in defining acceptance criteria is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 months ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shannan
2 months ago
C) No, because this new requirement would NOT be included in the original Prioritised Requirements List and therefore does NOT need acceptance criteria to be defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
2 months ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. The new requirement needs to be addressed and met in this Timebox, so defining acceptance criteria is appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberely
6 days ago
C) No, because this new requirement would NOT be included in the original Prioritised Requirements List and therefore does NOT need acceptance criteria to be defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
8 days ago
A) I agree, the new requirement is crucial and must be addressed in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
18 days ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 months ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77