Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS Exam CPIM-MPR Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-MPR exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 1
[All CPIM-MPR Questions]

The question below is based on the following production environment information:

In which facility would product unit costs most likely be reduced through a setup reduction program?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lazaro
25 days ago
Forget setup reduction, I'm more interested in the 'Facility Shuffle' - where we just constantly move everything around to keep things exciting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
27 days ago
I'm feeling a bit torn here. Maybe they should just install a revolving door in Facility A to speed up those changeovers. Efficiency hack, anyone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 months ago
Facility D, hands down. They're already pretty efficient, but a little setup reduction magic could make them unstoppable. Watch out, other facilities!
upvoted 0 times
Ling
2 days ago
I agree, Facility D seems like the best choice for reducing product unit costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alana
1 months ago
I'm going with Facility B. That facility seems to have the most room for improvement when it comes to setup times. Time to get those engineers working on some quick changeovers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 months ago
Hmm, looks like Facility C would be the best option for a setup reduction program. Those long changeover times are really killing their productivity.
upvoted 0 times
Merissa
21 days ago
Facility A and B seem to have relatively low changeover times, so they may not see as much cost reduction from a setup reduction program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
27 days ago
Facility D might also benefit from a setup reduction program, as they have a high number of changeovers per shift.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
1 months ago
I agree, Facility C seems to have the longest changeover times which could benefit the most from a setup reduction program.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ling
2 months ago
That's a good point, the layout in Facility C could definitely benefit from a setup reduction program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it would be in Facility C because of the layout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
2 months ago
I think product unit costs would be reduced in Facility B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77