Option B, huh? Sounds like someone needs to consult their crystal ball for the final decision. I'll stick with A - it's the equipment equivalent of copy-pasting, and we all know how reliable that is!
A all the way! It's like comparing apples to apples. Why wouldn't you be able to relate the inspection results? Unless the equipment is sentient, of course.
A all the way! It's like comparing apples to apples. Why wouldn't you be able to relate the inspection results? Unless the equipment is sentient, of course.
Definitely option A. If the conditions are the same, the inspection results can be used to make comparisons across equipment. Seems like a straightforward answer to me.
I agree, it would save time and resources to be able to relate inspection results from one equipment to another if the material and conditions are the same.
Ilene
2 months agoDaniel
4 days agoStephanie
5 days agoCharisse
1 months agoLouvenia
2 months agoLai
1 months agoCarlee
1 months agoJess
2 months agoThaddeus
1 months agoChi
1 months agoBettina
1 months agoTheron
1 months agoMireya
2 months agoMy
2 months agoKaran
2 months agoKanisha
2 months agoLoreen
23 days agoGregg
29 days agoKristel
1 months agoMichal
2 months agoBrigette
2 months agoStanford
2 months agoArt
2 months agoKattie
2 months agoWillard
2 months agoJohnetta
3 months ago