Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APC Exam DU0-001 Topic 3 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for APC's DU0-001 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 3
[All DU0-001 Questions]

Which UPS configuration presents the fewest single points of failure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Edda
1 months ago
I'm going with C) Isolated redundant. It may not be the most redundant, but at least I won't have to worry about my UPS system becoming self-aware and taking over the world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 months ago
D) Distributed redundant, definitely. Anything else would be like putting all your eggs in one basket, and we all know what happens when that basket falls...
upvoted 0 times
Tuyet
1 days ago
A) System + system
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
2 days ago
B) Parallel redundant
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
13 days ago
A) System + system
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through a bit more. Maybe I should have paid more attention in that UPS lecture.
upvoted 0 times
Kizzy
1 days ago
D) Distributed redundant
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
3 days ago
C) Isolated redundant
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
10 days ago
B) Parallel redundant
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 months ago
A) System + system
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aaron
2 months ago
B) Parallel redundant seems like the best option to me. It provides redundancy without the complexity of a distributed system.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
1 months ago
I think isolated redundant could also be a good option, as it provides a level of isolation for each component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 months ago
I agree, parallel redundant is a good choice for minimizing single points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is D) Distributed redundant. This configuration has the most redundancy and the fewest single points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
Rasheeda
20 days ago
System + system, A) System + system, might not be as reliable as the other options mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
21 days ago
C) Isolated redundant might work too, but it may not offer as much redundancy as D) Distributed redundant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
1 months ago
I think B) Parallel redundant could also be a good choice, as it provides redundancy as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 months ago
I agree, D) Distributed redundant is the best option for minimizing single points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think distributed redundant could also be a good option to minimize single points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
3 months ago
I agree with Gregg, having isolated redundant configuration minimizes single points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) Isolated redundant.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77