Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Planning Association Exam AICP Topic 10 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Planning Association's AICP exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 10
[All AICP Questions]

Who was known for satisficing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

You want to be fair in your treatment of a colleague while at the same time making sure that you do not engage a consultant who will not be able to fulfill the requirements of the professional services agreement.

Alternative 1 saves you work, but ignores the fact that you have information which affects your confidence in one of the proposers You would not be in violation of the Code by doing nothing because you would have followed all of your community's standard procedures for hiring However, you would have failed to be attentive to the apparitional intent of the Code.

Alternative 2 would be the most desirable and is most consistent with the Code requirement to fairly treat the views of a colleague In this case you wish to treat fairly the views of those who have disparaged the consultant as well as the view of the consultant him or herself Unless you have specifically stated in your RFP that the only references you will check are those provided by the consultant, you are free to seek out additional information. To be fair, you should mention to the consultant that you will be checking with other colleagues. If you have major unresolved issues as a result of further checking, the consultant should be given an opportunity to respond.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Latanya
28 days ago
Definitely D) Simon. I heard he was such a fan of satisficing that he even named his dog 'Satis' and his cat 'Fice'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
Hmm, let me see... Is it A) Friedmann? You know, the guy who was always 'satisficed' with his daily dose of Friedman Flakes?
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
14 days ago
No, it wasn't Friedmann.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jame
1 months ago
D) Simon, for sure. The guy was like the Godfather of satisficing. If he wasn't known for it, I don't know who would be.
upvoted 0 times
Johnetta
5 days ago
A) Friedmann was also known for satisficing, but Simon definitely stands out.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannetta
1 months ago
I'm going with D) Simon. Wasn't he the one who won the Nobel Prize for his work on bounded rationality and decision-making? Satisficing was kind of his thing, right?
upvoted 0 times
Leonida
8 days ago
Yes, you're right! Simon was known for satisficing and won the Nobel Prize for his work on bounded rationality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
2 months ago
I think it's B) Lindblom. Wasn't he the one who introduced the idea of 'muddling through' in decision-making? Satisficing sounds like a similar concept.
upvoted 0 times
Vince
10 days ago
Actually, it was Simon who introduced the concept of satisficing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
12 days ago
I believe it was Simon who was known for satisficing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
17 days ago
Yes, you're correct! Lindblom was known for satisficing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryrose
2 months ago
D) Simon seems like the obvious choice here. Wasn't he the one who talked about 'satisficing' as an alternative to maximizing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Simon's concept of satisficing is about making decisions that are good enough, not necessarily optimal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
2 months ago
I agree with Elli, Simon was known for satisficing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Simon.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77