Hmm, options B and D both sound like they're on the money. Lenders need clear policies and compensating factors when dealing with high-risk borrowers. No room for cowboys in subprime lending!
I'm thinking option A is the way to go. Debt-to-income ratios are a critical underwriting standard for subprime mortgages. Lenders need to keep a close eye on that metric.
B) Institutions should have a clear policy governing the use of risk-layering features, such as reduced documentation loans or simultaneous second lien mortgages
I'll go with option D. Layering multiple risk features requires robust compensating factors to support the underwriting decision. Gotta be careful with subprime lending, folks.
Wow, option C really hits the nail on the head. Stated income loans to subprime borrowers should only be made with strong mitigating factors. No room for risky lending practices here!
Option B seems to cover the key underwriting standards for subprime lending. Clear policies on risk-layering features are crucial to manage the risks involved.
Thad
1 months agoGianna
1 months agoRoyal
12 days agoTayna
13 days agoFatima
25 days agoElenore
2 months agoNorah
8 days agoWillodean
13 days agoFabiola
19 days agoSusy
2 months agoCeleste
2 months agoGerald
2 months agoBarrie
1 months agoBarrie
1 months agoSherill
2 months agoLamar
2 months agoSherill
2 months agoRosalind
2 months agoAlecia
2 months agoElouise
2 months agoRyan
2 months agoAlica
3 months ago