Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SCS-C02 Topic 5 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SCS-C02 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 5
[All SCS-C02 Questions]

A company runs workloads in the us-east-1 Region. The company has never deployed resources to other AWS Regions and does not have any multi-Region resources.

The company needs to replicate its workloads and infrastructure to the us-west-1 Region.

A security engineer must implement a solution that uses AWS Secrets Manager to store secrets in both Regions. The solution must use AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) to encrypt the secrets. The solution must minimize latency and must be able to work if only one Region is available.

The security engineer uses Secrets Manager to create the secrets in us-east-1.

What should the security engineer do next to meet the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To ensure minimal latency and regional availability of secrets, encrypting secrets in us-east-1 with a customer-managed KMS key and then replicating them to us-west-1 for encryption with the same key is the optimal approach. This method leverages customer-managed KMS keys for enhanced control and ensures that secrets are available in both regions, adhering to disaster recovery principles and minimizing latency by using regional endpoints.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Carri
10 days ago
Ah, I see. Option C takes it a step further by using a customer-managed KMS key in us-east-1. That way, we have more control over the encryption key and can potentially simplify the key management process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
11 days ago
But Option B is also interesting. By having the resources in us-west-1 call the Secrets Manager endpoint in us-east-1, we can avoid the need to replicate the secrets, which could be beneficial for performance and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
12 days ago
You've got a point there! Managing all those keys could get tricky. Maybe Option B is the way to go - fewer moving parts and still meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
13 days ago
Agreed. I think Option B is the most elegant solution here. Minimizing the complexity of the setup while still ensuring availability and low latency seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77