Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam MLS-C01 Topic 1 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 1
[All MLS-C01 Questions]

A machine learning (ML) developer for an online retailer recently uploaded a sales dataset into Amazon SageMaker Studio. The ML developer wants to obtain importance scores for each feature of the dataset. The ML developer will use the importance scores to feature engineer the dataset.

Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST development effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of SageMaker Studio that provides an end-to-end solution for importing, preparing, transforming, featurizing, and analyzing data. Data Wrangler includes built-in analyses that help generate visualizations and data insights in a few clicks. One of the built-in analyses is the Quick Model visualization, which can be used to quickly evaluate the data and produce importance scores for each feature. A feature importance score indicates how useful a feature is at predicting a target label. The feature importance score is between [0, 1] and a higher number indicates that the feature is more important to the whole dataset. The Quick Model visualization uses a random forest model to calculate the feature importance for each feature using the Gini importance method. This method measures the total reduction in node impurity (a measure of how well a node separates the classes) that is attributed to splitting on a particular feature. The ML developer can use the Quick Model visualization to obtain the importance scores for each feature of the dataset and use them to feature engineer the dataset. This solution requires the least development effort compared to the other options.

References:

* Analyze and Visualize

* Detect multicollinearity, target leakage, and feature correlation with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler


Contribute your Thoughts:

Slyvia
2 days ago
I think option A sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
11 days ago
Definitely. It's important to choose the option that will require the least development effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
12 days ago
I guess it depends on the specific needs and characteristics of the dataset. It's a tough decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
13 days ago
True, both options A) and D) could be viable solutions for the ML developer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
14 days ago
That's a good point. It might be worth considering option D) too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
15 days ago
But what about option D)? Wouldn't lasso feature selection also work well for obtaining importance scores?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
16 days ago
I agree, using SageMaker Data Wrangler for Gini importance score analysis seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
17 days ago
I think option A) sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
8 days ago
Good idea, let's go ahead and use SageMaker Data Wrangler for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 days ago
Let's go with option A) then, it's the least development effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
10 days ago
Yeah, it seems like the easiest way to get those importance scores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
11 days ago
I think using SageMaker Data Wrangler will definitely save us some time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
12 days ago
I agree with you, option A) sounds like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77