Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DOP-C02 Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C02 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All DOP-C02 Questions]

A company is using AWS to run digital workloads. Each application team in the company has its own AWS account for application hosting. The accounts are consolidated in an organization in AWS Organizations.

The company wants to enforce security standards across the entire organization. To avoid noncompliance because of security misconfiguration, the company has enforced the use of AWS CloudFormation. A production support team can modify resources in the production environment by using the AWS Management Console to troubleshoot and resolve application-related issues.

A DevOps engineer must implement a solution to identify in near real time any AWS service misconfiguration that results in noncompliance. The solution must automatically remediate the issue within 15 minutes of identification. The solution also must track noncompliant resources and events in a centralized dashboard with accurate timestamps.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST development overhead?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best solution is to use AWS Config and AWS Security Hub to identify and remediate noncompliant resources across multiple AWS accounts. AWS Config enables continuous monitoring of the configuration of AWS resources and evaluates them against desired configurations. AWS Config can also automatically remediate noncompliant resources by using conformance packs, which are a collection of AWS Config rules and remediation actions that can be deployed as a single entity. AWS Security Hub provides a comprehensive view of the security posture of AWS accounts and resources. AWS Security Hub can aggregate and normalize the findings from AWS Config and other AWS services, as well as from partner solutions. AWS Security Hub can also be used to create a dashboard for tracking noncompliant resources and events in a centralized location.

The other options are not optimal because they either require more development overhead, do not provide near real time detection and remediation, or do not provide a centralized dashboard for tracking.

Option A is not optimal because CloudFormation drift detection is not a near real time solution. Drift detection has to be manually initiated on each stack or resource, or scheduled using a cron expression. Drift detection also does not provide remediation actions, so a custom Lambda function has to be developed and invoked. CloudWatch Logs and dashboard can be used for tracking, but they do not provide a comprehensive view of the security posture of the AWS accounts and resources.

Option B is not optimal because CloudTrail logs analysis using Athena is not a near real time solution. Athena queries have to be manually run or scheduled using a cron expression. Athena also does not provide remediation actions, so a custom Lambda function has to be developed and invoked. Step Functions can be used to orchestrate the query and remediation workflow, but it adds more complexity and cost. QuickSight dashboard can be used for tracking, but it does not provide a comprehensive view of the security posture of the AWS accounts and resources.

Option D is not optimal because CloudTrail logs analysis using CloudWatch Logs is not a near real time solution. CloudWatch Logs filters have to be manually created or updated for each resource type and configuration change. CloudWatch Logs also does not provide remediation actions, so a custom Lambda function has to be developed and invoked. EventBridge can be used to trigger the Lambda function, but it adds more complexity and cost. OpenSearch Service dashboard can be used for tracking, but it does not provide a comprehensive view of the security posture of the AWS accounts and resources.


AWS Config conformance packs

Introducing AWS Config conformance packs

Managing conformance packs across all accounts in your organization

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mona
24 days ago
Haha, I'm just imagining the support team trying to troubleshoot issues using the AWS Management Console. That's like trying to fix a car by kicking the tires. Anyway, I think the Config and Security Hub solution is the way to go. It's the most comprehensive and should meet the requirements with the least ongoing maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
24 days ago
The CloudTrail and OpenSearch Service approach is interesting, but I'm not sure how well it would scale across multiple accounts. The Config and Security Hub solution seems like the most turnkey option, even if it has a higher initial setup cost. Besides, I like the idea of a centralized dashboard for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
26 days ago
I agree, the CloudFormation solution sounds promising, but the remediation timeline might be a challenge. The Config and Security Hub option seems more comprehensive, but it might have a higher setup overhead. I'm leaning towards that one, but I'd like to hear what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
27 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky question. CloudFormation drift detection seems like a good option, but I'm not sure if it can handle the 15-minute remediation requirement. The Athena and CloudWatch Logs approach could work, but it might be overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Ranee
5 days ago
B: It looks like we're all leaning towards Option A as the solution that meets the requirements with the least development overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
6 days ago
C: I see your point. Option A does seem like a reliable choice for enforcing security standards across the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
8 days ago
A: Exactly. Option A provides real-time identification of misconfigurations and automated remediation, which is crucial for maintaining security standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
8 days ago
D: I think Option A can handle the 15-minute requirement if set up properly. It's a good balance of efficiency and simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
9 days ago
C: But what about the 15-minute automatic remediation requirement? Do you think Option A can meet that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
10 days ago
B: I agree. Option A seems to be the most straightforward solution with minimal development overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
12 days ago
A: Option A seems like the best choice. CloudFormation drift detection coupled with Lambda function for remediation sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77