Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SOA-C02 Topic 8 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SOA-C02 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 8
[All SOA-C02 Questions]

A company has an application that collects notifications from thousands of alarm systems. The notifications include alarm notifications and information notifications. The information notifications include the system arming processes, disarming processes, and sensor status.

All notifications are kept as messages in an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue. Amazon EC2 instances that are in an Auto Scaling group process the messages. A SysOps administrator needs to implement a solution that prioritizes alarm notifications over information notifications.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tresa
9 days ago
Maybe we could rig up a system where the alarm notifications trigger a loud siren and flashing lights to really get the EC2 instances' attention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
28 days ago
Adding a DynamoDB stream? That's like trying to put out a fire with a squirt gun. Definitely not the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
3 days ago
A: That sounds like a good idea to prioritize alarm notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
5 days ago
A: Adjust the Auto Scaling group to scale faster when a high number of messages is in the queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
11 days ago
B: Use the Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) fanout feature with Amazon SQS to send the notifications in parallel to all the EC2 instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
13 days ago
A: Adjust the Auto Scaling group to scale faster when a high number of messages is in the queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jess
1 months ago
Using Amazon SNS fanout could work, but it might be overkill for this use case. Plus, it doesn't really address the need to prioritize the alarm notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
1 months ago
I prefer option B, using SNS fanout feature seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
1 months ago
I agree with Aliza, separating the queues makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 months ago
I think option D is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 months ago
I'm not sure why we need to scale the Auto Scaling group faster when we can just prioritize the alarm notifications. That seems like an unnecessary complication.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
1 days ago
User 2: That's a good idea. We can update the application to process messages from the alarm notifications queue first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
6 days ago
User 1: We could just create separate queues for alarm notifications and information notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 days ago
B: That sounds like a simpler solution. We don't need to adjust the scaling of the Auto Scaling group unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
17 days ago
A: We could just create separate queues for alarm and information notifications, that way we can process alarm notifications first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lea
1 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward and effective solution to prioritize alarm notifications. Separating the queues makes it easier to handle the different types of notifications.
upvoted 0 times
Elroy
10 days ago
It's important to ensure that critical notifications are processed quickly and efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
12 days ago
I agree, having separate queues will definitely help in prioritizing alarm notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
13 days ago
Separating the queues makes it easier to handle the different types of notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
19 days ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward and effective solution to prioritize alarm notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
1 months ago
I prefer option B, using SNS fanout feature seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 months ago
I agree with Odette, separating the queues makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
2 months ago
I think option D is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a