Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SOA-C02 Topic 3 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SOA-C02 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 3
[All SOA-C02 Questions]

A company's SysOps administrator maintains a highly available environment. The environment includes Amazon EC2 instances and an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ database. The EC2 instances are in an Auto Scaling group behind an Application Load Balancer.

Recently, the company conducted a failover test. The SysOps administrator needs to decrease the failover time of the RDS database by at least 10%.

Which solution will meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jesus
10 months ago
What is this, a trick question? The answer is clearly A. Bigger is always better, right? Forget all this multi-AZ and proxy nonsense, just crank up that RDS instance and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
D, the RDS proxy, now that's a clever solution. Redirecting the app through the proxy endpoint could make the failover process much smoother. I like it!
upvoted 0 times
Jordan
10 months ago
Redirecting the app through the proxy endpoint could make the failover process much smoother. I like it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
10 months ago
D, the RDS proxy, now that's a clever solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonardo
11 months ago
C is an interesting option, creating a read replica in another region and promoting it in case of failure. That could definitely reduce failover time, but it might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Jeniffer
9 months ago
A: True, we should consider all options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
10 months ago
B: Yeah, but it might be a bit overkill for this scenario. Maybe there's a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
10 months ago
A: I think C is a good option, creating a read replica in another region could really help with reducing failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
10 months ago
A: That could work. It might help decrease the failover time without adding too much complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
10 months ago
B: Yeah, I agree. Maybe increasing the RDS instance size would be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
10 months ago
A: I think option C is a bit too much for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mirta
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D with RDS proxy would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
11 months ago
Hmm, increasing the RDS instance size seems like the obvious choice, but I'm not sure if that's really the best way to decrease failover time. Modifying the cluster to a single AZ could be faster, but that might compromise availability.
upvoted 0 times
Vi
10 months ago
B: Yeah, promoting the read replica in case of failure could definitely decrease the failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
10 months ago
A: I think creating a read replica in another AWS Region could be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
10 months ago
A: Yeah, it's a good way to ensure high availability while also improving failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
10 months ago
B: Yeah, promoting the read replica in case of failure could definitely help decrease failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
10 months ago
B: I agree, promoting the read replica in case of failure could definitely decrease the failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
11 months ago
A: I think creating a read replica in another AWS Region could be a good solution. It would help with failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
11 months ago
A: I think creating a read replica in another AWS Region could be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
11 months ago
I think option C could work well for decreasing failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77