Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SOA-C02 Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SOA-C02 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All SOA-C02 Questions]

A recent organizational audit uncovered an existing Amazon RDS database that is not currently configured for high availability. Given the critical nature of this database, it must be configured for high availability as soon as possible.

How can this requirement be met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

AWS Global Accelerator and Amazon CloudFront are separate services that use the AWS global network and its edge locations around the world. CloudFront improves performance for both cacheable content (such as images and videos) and dynamic content (such as API acceleration and dynamic site delivery). Global Accelerator improves performance for a wide range of applications over TCP or UDP by proxying packets at the edge to applications running in one or more AWS Regions. Global Accelerator is a good fit for non-HTTP use cases, such as gaming (UDP), IoT (MQTT), or Voice over IP, as well as for HTTP use cases that specifically require static IP addresses or deterministic, fast regional failover. Both services integrate with AWS Shield for DDoS protection.

https://medium.com/awesome-cloud/aws-difference-between-application-load-balancer-and-network-load-balancer-cb8b6cd296a4 https://aws.amazon.com/global-accelerator/faqs/?nc1=h_ls


Contribute your Thoughts:

Skye
2 months ago
I wonder if the 'create-db-instance-read-replica' option would work for this? Nah, it's probably just trying to trick us. Option C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Lynda
8 days ago
Yeah, I don't think the 'create-db-instance-read-replica' option is necessary in this case. Option C is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
18 days ago
I agree, modifying the RDS instance to include the Multi-AZ option seems like the most reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
23 days ago
I think option C is the best choice. It's the most straightforward way to configure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erin
2 months ago
Haha, who even uses the --na flag? That's gotta be a joke answer. Definitely going with option C, it's the only one that makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Lili
15 days ago
User1: Sounds good, let's get this database configured for high availability as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
16 days ago
User3: Option C it is then, let's go with modifying the RDS instance to include Multi-AZ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, I don't think using the --na flag is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
2 months ago
User1: I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janey
2 months ago
I'm not sure about using the --na flag. That doesn't sound right. I'd go with option C to enable Multi-AZ for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Modifying the RDS instance using the console to include the Multi-AZ option is the simplest and most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Martina
1 months ago
I agree, that sounds like the best solution to ensure high availability for the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Modifying the RDS instance using the console to include the Multi-AZ option is the simplest and most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should also consider modifying the RDS instance to include the Multi-AZ option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
2 months ago
I agree with Miss, that sounds like the best option for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
2 months ago
I think we should switch to an active/passive database pair.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77