Amazon Exam SAP-C02 Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 2

A company is migrating a monolithic on-premises .NET Framework production application to AWS. Application demand will grow exponentially in the next 6 months. The company must ensure that the application can scale appropriately.

The application currently connects to a Microsoft SQL Server transactional database. The company has well-documented source code for the application. Some business logic is contained within stored procedures.

A solutions architect must recommend a solution to redesign the application to meet the growth in demand.

Which solution will meet this requirement MOST cost-effectively?

AUse Amazon API Gateway APIs and Amazon EC2 Spot Instances to rehost the application with a scalable microservices architecture. Deploy the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group. Configure EC2 Auto Scaling. Store the data and stored procedures in Amazon RDS for SQL Server.

BUse AWS Application Migration Service to migrate the application to AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Deploy Elastic Beanstalk packages to configure and deploy the application as microservices. Deploy Elastic Beanstalk across multiple Availability Zones and configure auto scaling. Store the data and stored procedures in Amazon RDS for MySQL.

CMigrate the applications by using AWS App2Container. Use AWS Fargate in multiple AWS Regions to host the containers. Use Amazon API Gateway APIs and AWS Lambda functions to call the containers. Store the data and stored procedures in Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DUse Amazon API Gateway APIs and AWS Lambda functions to decouple the application into microservices. Use the AWS Schema Conversion Tool (AWS SCT) to review and modify the stored procedures. Store the data in Amazon Aurora Serverless v2.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Vallie at Feb 11, 2025, 09:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAP-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Genevieve

2 months ago

Wow, these options are making my head spin! I need a coffee break before I can think about this any further.

upvoted 0 times

Loise

18 days ago

Yes, sometimes stepping away for a bit can help clear your mind. Enjoy your coffee!

upvoted 0 times

...

Octavio

20 days ago

Coffee breaks are essential for productivity. Enjoy your break!

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

23 days ago

I agree, these options can be overwhelming. It's important to take a break and come back with a fresh perspective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

1 months ago

Don't worry, take your time to relax and recharge with some coffee.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

2 months ago

Option D is tempting, but I'm not sure about the feasibility of modifying all the stored procedures. Might be a bit of a hassle.

upvoted 0 times

Derick

28 days ago

D: I see your point about modifying stored procedures, but Amazon Aurora Serverless v2 could be worth it for scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Grover

29 days ago

C: Option C seems interesting with AWS Fargate and Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bev

1 months ago

B: I agree, using Amazon RDS for SQL Server will also help with data storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

1 months ago

A: Option A sounds like a good choice for scalability with EC2 Auto Scaling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

2 months ago

That's a good point, but I still think option A is better because it deploys EC2 instances in a cluster placement group for better performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is more cost-effective as it decouples the application into microservices and uses AWS Lambda functions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

3 months ago

Option C is interesting, but using DynamoDB Accelerator for the stored procedures seems risky. I'd stick with a more traditional database approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Layla

3 months ago

I'd go with Option B. Elastic Beanstalk makes it easy to manage the microservices, and RDS for MySQL is a reliable database solution.

upvoted 0 times

Ula

29 days ago

Using AWS Application Migration Service will make the migration process smoother.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

1 months ago

RDS for MySQL is a solid database option for storing data and stored procedures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

2 months ago

I agree, managing microservices with Elastic Beanstalk is convenient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rochell

2 months ago

Option B sounds like a good choice. Elastic Beanstalk is user-friendly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivan

3 months ago

Option A seems the most cost-effective as it uses EC2 Spot Instances and a scalable microservices architecture. Deploying in a cluster placement group should also help with performance.

upvoted 0 times

Victor

2 months ago

I think Option D could also be a good choice. Decoupling the application into microservices and using AWS Lambda functions could provide flexibility for future growth.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willis

2 months ago

I agree, Option A does seem like the most cost-effective solution. Using EC2 Spot Instances and a microservices architecture should help with scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice because it uses Amazon API Gateway APIs and EC2 Spot Instances for scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...