Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAP-C02 Topic 1 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 1
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A solutions architect needs to advise a company on how to migrate its on-premises data processing application to the AWS Cloud. Currently, users upload input files through a web portal. The web server then stores the uploaded files on NAS and messages the processing server over a message queue. Each media file can take up to 1 hour to process. The company has determined that the number of media files awaiting processing is significantly higher during business hours, with the number of files rapidly declining after business hours.

What is the MOST cost-effective migration recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Janae
22 days ago
Wow, 1 hour to process a media file? I wonder if they're using a potato as the processing server. Probably need to upgrade that hardware, ya think?
upvoted 0 times
Giuseppe
3 days ago
B: Yeah, Lambda can definitely help speed up the processing time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
11 days ago
A: A sounds like the best option. Using Lambda to process the files seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latanya
27 days ago
C, really? MO? I think you meant to say SQS. That's a typo waiting to happen on the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
1 months ago
D looks tempting, but the cost of running EC2 instances 24/7 might be higher than the other options. Gotta keep an eye on that queue length.
upvoted 0 times
Marylyn
12 days ago
B) Create a queue using Amazon M. Configure the existing web server to publish to the new queue. When there are messages in the queue, create a new Amazon EC2 instance to pull requests from the queue and process the files. Store the processed files in Amazon EFS. Shut down the EC2 instance after the task is complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
14 days ago
A) Create a queue using Amazon SQS. Configure the existing web server to publish to the new queue. When there are messages in the queue, invoke an AWS Lambda function to pull requests from the queue and process the files. Store the processed files in an Amazon S3 bucket.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wava
1 months ago
I'm not convinced that EFS is the best storage option here. S3 might be a better choice for its durability and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
Estrella
1 days ago
A: Definitely. Plus, using AWS Lambda to process the files can help with cost-effectiveness and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
3 days ago
B: I agree. S3 is more durable and scalable compared to EFS. It's a better option for storing the processed files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
16 days ago
A: I think option A is the best choice. Using Amazon SQS and storing the processed files in an Amazon S3 bucket makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
I prefer option D. Using EC2 instances with Auto Scaling can handle high workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
2 months ago
I agree with Lizbeth. Using Amazon SQS and AWS Lambda seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
2 months ago
A seems like the most cost-effective option. Lambda functions are a great way to handle the variable workload without the need to manage EC2 instances.
upvoted 0 times
Anglea
3 days ago
User 3: Lambda functions are great for handling variable workloads efficiently, especially when the number of files to process fluctuates throughout the day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
4 days ago
User 2: Definitely, using Lambda functions to process the files based on the queue messages is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
5 days ago
User 1: I agree, option A with Lambda functions seems like the best choice for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lizbeth
2 months ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77