A data analysis company has two SAP landscapes that consist of sandbox development QA, pre-production and production servers. One landscape is on Windows and the other landscape is on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The servers reside in a room m a building that other tenants share.
An SAP solutions architect proposes to migrate the SAP applications to AWS The SAP solutions architect wants to move the production backups to AWS and wants to make the backups highly available to restore >n case of unavailability of an on-premises server.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Take a backup of the production servers, Implement an Amazon S3 File Gateway, Create file shares by using the S3 File Gateway, Copy the backup files to the file shares through NFS and SMB, Map backup files directly to Amazon S3 and Configure an S3 Lifecycle policy to send the backup files to S3 Glacier based on the company's data retention policy. This option is cost-effective because it avoids the need for third-party tools, tape drives and storage gateways, and reduces the amount of time and resources needed for the migration process. Additionally, the S3 lifecycle policy allows you to automate the storage and archiving process and ensure that your data is stored in the most cost-effective way.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!