Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam DOP-C02 Topic 4 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C02 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 4
[All DOP-C02 Questions]

A company has a legacy application A DevOps engineer needs to automate the process of building the deployable artifact for the legacy application. The solution must store the deployable artifact in an existing Amazon S3 bucket for future deployments to reference

Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST operationally efficient way?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Step 2: Creating CloudWatch Metric Filters CloudWatch metric filters can be used to search for specific patterns in log data. The operations team can create filters for certain log patterns and set up alarms based on these filters.

Action: Instruct the operations team to create CloudWatch metric filters to detect patterns in the WAF log output.

Why: Metric filters allow the team to trigger alarms based on specific patterns without needing to manually search through logs.

This corresponds to Option A: Create an Amazon CloudWatch Logs log group. Configure the appropriate AWS WAF web ACL to send log messages to the log group. Instruct the operations team to create CloudWatch metric filters.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Filiberto
1 months ago
I'm going with Option B. Old-school EC2 instance FTW! Who needs all these fancy containers and Kubernetes when you've got a good ol' virtual machine?
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
5 days ago
I agree with you, Option B is the way to go. Sometimes the old-school methods are the most reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
7 days ago
I think using containers with Option A would be more efficient. It's the modern way to handle deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
8 days ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. EC2 instances are reliable and easy to work with.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefany
1 months ago
Ha, I bet the legacy app is written in COBOL and requires a mainframe to run. Any of these cloud-based solutions are gonna be a headache to set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 months ago
Option D is interesting, but it might be overkill for a legacy application. Spinning up an entire EKS cluster just to build and deploy the artifact seems a bit excessive.
upvoted 0 times
Norah
5 days ago
Yeah, using a custom Docker image with AWS CodeBuild to build and save the artifact to S3 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
18 days ago
I think option A would be the most operationally efficient way to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
28 days ago
I agree, option D does seem like overkill for a legacy application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Having a custom EC2 Image Builder image with all the dependencies pre-installed could make the deployment process simpler and more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
5 days ago
Yeah, having a custom EC2 Image Builder image with everything set up already could save a lot of time and reduce the chances of errors during deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
8 days ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most efficient way to automate building and storing the deployable artifact for the legacy application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
16 days ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. Having all the dependencies pre-installed can definitely streamline the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolf
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D also seems interesting with Amazon EKS and AWS Fargate. It could be a scalable solution for future deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 months ago
I agree with Herminia. Option A with Docker image and AWS CodeBuild sounds like the best choice for automating the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I think option A is the most operationally efficient way. Using Docker image and AWS CodeBuild seems like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
Option A looks like the most straightforward solution. Using a custom Docker image and CodeBuild seems like a clean and efficient way to automate the build process.
upvoted 0 times
Vannessa
24 days ago
Absolutely, it's important to have an efficient and reliable process in place for building and deploying applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 months ago
It's definitely a good choice for automating the build and deployment process. Plus, storing the artifact in S3 for future reference is convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
1 months ago
I agree, Docker images make it easy to manage dependencies and CodeBuild can streamline the build process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
2 months ago
Option A looks like the most straightforward solution. Using a custom Docker image and CodeBuild seems like a clean and efficient way to automate the build process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77