Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam BDS-C00 Topic 9 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 9
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

Your company operates a website for promoters to sell tickets for entertainment events. You are using a load balancer in front of an Auto Scaling group of web server. Promotion of popular events can cause surges of websites visitors. During scaling-out at theses times, newly launched instances are unable to complete configuration quickly enough, leading to user disappointment.

What option should you choose to improve scaling yet minimize costs? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jodi
17 hours ago
Redirecting to a holding page? That's a creative solution, but I'm not sure it's the best way to handle scaling issues. Seems like a bit of a Band-Aid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
4 days ago
I like the idea of using past data to predict future scaling needs. Scheduled scaling seems like a smart way to stay ahead of the curve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
10 days ago
I personally think option E could also be beneficial. Redirecting to a holding page during high load could help manage user disappointment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
11 days ago
I agree with Leonora. Creating a new AMI with pre-configured application and using past scaling events for prediction seem like practical solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
12 days ago
I think options A and D could be good choices to improve scaling and minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
13 days ago
Ooh, using a custom metric to trigger scaling is an interesting idea. I wonder if that would give us more granular control over the scaling process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
15 days ago
B looks promising, but I'm not sure how well pre-warming would work with unpredictable traffic surges. Might be worth a try though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
15 days ago
I see your point, Edna. Option D could definitely help in planning ahead. I personally think a combination of options A and D would be the best approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
16 days ago
I agree with Mel, option A seems like a good choice. But I also think option D could be useful for predicting future scaling requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
19 days ago
A and D seem like a good combination to me. Pre-configuring the AMI and using scheduled scaling based on past trends could really help with the scaling challenges.
upvoted 0 times
Earlean
18 hours ago
A and D are good options. Pre-configuring the AMI can speed up the launch process, and using scheduled scaling based on past trends can help predict future requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mel
21 days ago
I think option A could help by reducing the time it takes for new instances to configure
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77